Security Comparison

Traditional Authentication vs QuantumPass

Security Ratings

Traditional Authentication

overall
62%
data Protection
55%
breach Prevention
40%
user Experience
70%
implementation
85%

QuantumPass

overall
96%
data Protection
98%
breach Prevention
95%
user Experience
90%
implementation
80%

Vulnerability Analysis

High Risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
No Risk

Password Database Breach

Traditional
QuantumPass

Phishing Attacks

Traditional
QuantumPass

Brute Force Attacks

Traditional
QuantumPass

Credential Stuffing

Traditional
QuantumPass

Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

Traditional
QuantumPass

Device Cloning Attacks

Traditional
QuantumPass

Traditional Authentication

High Risk

If the password database is compromised, all user credentials are exposed, requiring password resets and potentially leading to account takeovers across multiple platforms due to password reuse.

Mitigation Strategy:

Password hashing, salting, and database encryption

QuantumPass Authentication

No Risk

No persistent credentials are stored in the system - there is no password database to breach.

Prevention Strategy:

Zero Persistent Credentials architecture completely eliminates this attack vector.

Looking for information on pricing and ROI?